Amroha District Commission Holds Reliance Retails Liable For Delivering Defective AirPods Pro With Different IMEI Number

Update: 2023-12-17 06:30 GMT
Click the Play button to listen to article
story

The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Amroha (Uttar Pradesh) bench comprising Shri Nisamuddin (President) and Smt. Anju Rani Dixit (Member) held Reliance Retail Limited liable for unfair trade practice for delivering Apple AirPods pro with a different IMEI number than the one written on the receipt. The District Commission noted that despite several attempts made by...

Your free access to Live Law has expired
Please Subscribe for unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments, Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.

The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Amroha (Uttar Pradesh) bench comprising Shri Nisamuddin (President) and Smt. Anju Rani Dixit (Member) held Reliance Retail Limited liable for unfair trade practice for delivering Apple AirPods pro with a different IMEI number than the one written on the receipt. The District Commission noted that despite several attempts made by the Complainant, Reliance Retail failed to resolve his grievances.

Brief Facts:

Mr Prashant Kumar (“Complainant”) bought Apple AirPods Pro worth Rs. 18990/- from Reliance Retail Limited's (“Retailer”) online website. When the AirPods were delivered, the Complainant observed that the International Mobile Equipment Identity (“IMEI”) number of the AirPods was different than the one printed on the receipt. Further, the AirPods were not properly connecting with the cell phone's Bluetooth. Consequently, the Complainant registered a complaint with the Retailer. However, no reply was received. The AirPods were then sent to Future World Retail India (“Service Provider”). The Service Provider returned the AirPods based on the reason that the IMEI was different and service could not be provided. The Complainant emailed the Retailer again. This time, instead of returning or refunding the AirPods, the Retailer again directed the Service Provider to fix the AirPods. Feeling aggrieved, the Complainant filed a consumer complaint in the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Amroha, Uttar Pradesh (“District Commission”).

Observations by the Commission:

The District Commission perused the evidence presented by the Complainant and established that the Retailer failed to deliver the AirPods with the correct IMEI number. Further, despite several attempts at communication, the customer's grievances were left unresolved. This amounted to unfair trade practices and a violation of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

Consequently, the District Commission directed the retailer to refund the purchase amount of the AirPods and pay Rs. 3,000/- as compensation for mental agony and Rs. 2,000/- as legal costs to the Complainant.

Case Title: Prashant Kumar vs Reliance Retail Limited and Anr.

Case No.: Complaint No. 25 of 2023

Click Here To Read/Download The Order

Tags:    

Similar News