Centre, States Stifling Functioning of RTI Act: Petition In SC To Fill Vacancies In CIC, State Commissions [Read Petition]

With thousands of complaints and appeals under the RTI Act pending before the Central Information Commission and the commissions in various states plagued by unfilled vacancies, three transparency campaigners have moved the Supreme Court seeking direction to the Centre to immediately fill up all vacant posts through a transparent and time-bound manner.

Petitioners Anjali Bhardwaj, co-convenor of the National Campaign for Peoples’ Right to Information (NCPRI); Commodore Lokesh K Batra (Retd); and Amrita Johri, a member of NCPRI; have moved the apex court ruing how “the Government of India and state governments have attempted to stifle the functioning of the RTI Act by failing to do their statutory duty of ensuring appointment of commissioners in the Central Information Commission and State Information Commissions, in a timely manner”.

“This is despite huge backlogs of appeals and complaints in many information commissions across the country. Due to non-appointment of information commissioners, several information commissions take many months, and in some cases, even years, to decide appeals and complaints due to the accumulation of pending appeals/complaints, thus defeating the entire object of the RTI Act, 2005. Currently, there are four vacancies in the Central Information Commission, even though more than 23,500 appeals and complaints are pending,” says the petition.

Some of the shortcomings which the petition highlights are:

• The State Information Commission (SIC) of Andhra Pradesh is completely non-functional as not a single information commissioner has been appointed to the commission.


• The SIC of Maharashtra, which has a backlog of more than 40,000 appeals and complaints, has four vacancies.


• The SIC of Kerala is functioning with only a single commissioner and has more than 14,000 pending appeals and complaints.


• There are six vacancies in the SIC of Karnataka even though nearly 33,000 appeals and complaints are pending.


• Odisha is functioning with only three commissioners and Telangana with two commissioners and their backlogs are more than 10,000 and 15,000 appeals/complaints, respectively.


• The SIC of West Bengal is functioning with only two commissioners and is hearing appeals/complaints which were filed 10 years ago.


• Further, several information commissions like that of Gujarat, Nagaland and Maharashtra are functioning without the Chief Information Commissioner, even though the RTI Act envisages a crucial role for the chief commissioner, with the administration and superintendence of the commission vesting with the chief.

The petition also adds that lack of transparency in the appointment of information commissioners, and the violation of directions of the Supreme Court regarding the procedure for appointment of information.

It is to be noted that on June 5, 2017, petitioners had also signed a letter by the NCPRI addressed to the Prime Minister urging him to fill the vacancies in the Central Information Commission by appointing information commissioners.

In September 2017, a response to an RTI application revealed that the Prime Minister’s Office had treated the letter as a grievance and registered it on the online grievance portal of the Central government. Upon tracking the grievance on the online portal, the status showed that the case was closed as the matter was pending.

The petition impleads the Centre, governments of West Bengal, Andhra Pradesh, Kerala, Maharashtra, Gujarat, Odisha, Karnataka, Telangana and Nagaland, and is listed for hearing on July 2.

It prays for direction to the Centre to take immediate steps to fill the vacancies in the CIC by making the appointment of information commissioners in a transparent and time-bound manner while also directing the states concerned to appoint Chief State Information Commissioners and Information Commissioners.

It also urges that the government should be directed to commence the selection process for information commissioners, including the chief, at least three months prior to the occurrence of vacancy and all records of deliberations and rational criteria related to shortlisting and selection of the Chief Information Commissioner and other Information Commissioners be properly recorded and made available to citizens in consonance with the provisions of the RTI Act.

Besides, it seeks transparency in the selection process by the publication of advertisements for inviting applications, publicly disclosing, including through the website, the procedure and rational criteria for shortlisting candidates, if any shortlisting is done.